Zonepk.com Pushto_music

building to house the discipline of psychology

Dear colleagues, I would have expected a more sincere and constructive opening of this space, a demonstration of what I would like to publish in full two written comments in response to my letter:

"It is important to gather accurate information and constructively each stimulus that can bring out this our profession and restore the dignity of knowledge that professional psychologists who have gone before us have failed to highlight.

Excellent initiative, I will give my contribution (Isabella D'Ambrosio). http://isa-crimeanalysis.blogspot.com/

" I join. I agree with the perception of a new situation for us psychologists, which we are increasingly engaged in working areas distant from those for which we have trained.

Single underline, from a "mea culpa" about the real training academy in my view, we gain more and more distant from the issues relevant to the study and support of various "inconveniences." Unite For the rest, "Joseph Salzer. h ttp: / / www.giuseppesalzillo.blogspot.com/

Ideally it is the key allegations "restore dignity to the profession" and do a ".... Mea culpa ... ... "I want to ask as the first brick in building a new building for the psychological disciplines (Who ambition!).

the above, let me point out some talking points (some provocative, more realistic) than to the demands made by all the comments and the letter opening the blog:

1. which takes place in the collective psychology built by the media (press, TV, web, etc..), and, above all, corresponds to the real characteristics of our discipline?

2. because, although there is so little "palatability media" (I assume it!), tens of thousands of people chose to do this job and other various tens of thousands are going to study theories, techniques and methods of psychology?

3. because the families of psychologists and psychologists do not seem to exist the phenomenon of transmission of the passion for the profession to their children (who almost always decide to devote themselves to others)?

4. because a small minority of psychologists owns 100% of professional power (both in the public and private), while thousands of psychologists superfomati are found to carry out work in therapeutic communities, rehabilitation, education, moreover, within the framework of other professional profiles?

5. because to aspire to a place work is necessary to specialize (after 5 years of university course, hundreds of hours of training and an examination of state)?

6. because psychoanalysis now smells like mold?

7. because psychologists do not have a channel for access to schools of all levels, given the immense usefulness of diagnostic techniques for the prevention of several states of discomfort?

8. because the social services of municipalities, already deprived of abundant resources, have become even more evanescent for the general decrease in hours for the agreements provided for Psychologists and Social Workers ?

for today, believe that's enough.
In the hope that it offered some ideas for discussion I offer cordial greetings.